How clever answer reason for leaving.

<P> Case: Mr. Yao Wuchang an advertising company in 5 years, the business is a player. .But not with the boss and long-term, Yao unbearable, and finally chose to quit. .</ P> <P> at a friend's recommendation, Mr. Yao interviewed several companies. .Without exception, officials have asked the reasons to quit. .At first, Mr. Yao speak up, but failed to apply for success. .Inquire after friends told Mr. Yao, the other that he is very good business, but "not with the boss and" this, but a veto by Mr. Yao --- with the relationship with all things to be seen not deal with interpersonal relationships. .</ P> <P> So, Yao learn the reasons for departure to "low income" units can still several candidates dare not take him. .Friends find out and told Mr. Yao, the other fear of him as a "transitional" unit, a unit of poaching better, it could jump ship again. .</ P> <P> Yao headache to say: "'Why switch to' really a mystery, how to answer, are likely to be caught recruiters 'pigtail'." </ P> <P> advanced vocational .Instructor Emitting Forces of HE: try to play down the sensitive answers, not to recruit staff to leave room for speculation. .</ P> <P> had survey shows that the common reason for leaving the interview include: poor interpersonal treatment, substandard income expectations do not get along with your boss, work pressure and so on. .But corporate recruiters point of view, these reasons are more or less job itself contains factors that may affect the future work of the play, such as interpersonal relationships with colleagues and customers, salary, can not bear competition. .Therefore do not recommend the use of such reasons. .</ P> <P> Recommendation: Try to work with and little to the left can be understood by human reason, such as to comply with career planning, work is too far of the work, charging, vacation, sick and so on. .</ P> <P> NOTE: Avoid sensitive to answer, does not mean cheating, and details such as the recruitment of staff to ask questions should be answered truthfully. .Otherwise, the applicant's credibility may be compromised, less likelihood of success. .</ P>.