Workplace strategy: how to cleverly marginalized by colleagues to resolve barriers.

<P> Everyone in the process of interpersonal communication, must have encountered the so-called opinion leaders. .Opinion leaders and followers, will form small groups, leaders of public opinion, in the social network has a considerable influence on, and sometimes even lead the entire group with the exclusion someone. .</ P> <P> students with opinion leaders if the sub-period, because no interest in each other, at most only interfere with each other; Once in the job market experiencing a similar situation, not ignore them can be resolved. .In addition to causing isolation and psychological pressure, are more likely to be deliberately making things difficult because of reduced efficiency. .</ P> <P> opinion leaders in the face of exclusion, we must first assess the situation, usually by interaction with colleagues to observe all the people really crush you? .Only opinion leaders crush you, other people just do not comment? .Or simply their own suspicious? .Sometimes things may not be as bad imagination, do not dead end. .</ P> <P> sure my colleagues have been isolated crowded out, but also based on the object to be processed. .If the person is not related with their ordinary business people, as long as their EQ is high enough, to spread his words or actions, you can not make any response, because the different interpersonal circle, meet slim. .However, if the other frequent contacts with you at work, can not continue to maintain the deadlock. .One flight knot, better reconciliation with each other. .</ P> <P> reconciliation three-step </ P> <P> a first step, reflect on whether they have the wrong. .If the other party do not want to tell you, you can consult other colleagues or people in the office of social justice. .</ P> <P> second step, to accommodate, may be able to. .Hold back the grievance was painful, so be sure to relax the mind, to accommodate everything. .More open the idea that someone like you in this world, people are bound to hate you, has always been the norm, do not bother to enlarge annoying part. .</ P> <P> The third step is to seek reconciliation. .Find other reasons for exclusion of your reconciliation process, with important differences in seeking to identify common interests, position, knowledge of the people (relationship), the scope of activities intersect with each other, problems can be easily solved. .</ P> <P> tried various methods, if the other party still refuses to accept the settlement, then the problem is not their own, and in each other. .After all, do not knock a copper ring, they can only let the deadlock continue. .At least worthy of their pitch. .</ P> <P> inappropriate friends as colleagues </ P> <P> worst approach is to war. .Beat each other to become opinion leaders in their own, away each other's followers, to suppress his head through the other side, this is a negative approach, with the emotional dispute. .There was a company quality control department and production department in charge of irregularities, the two sides find fault with each other, causing the delay in shipping companies, reduced productivity, the parties, all of the other party and the company lost the war. .Therefore inappropriate to remember friends, the principle can be a colleague. .Official dealings must be straight on the complaints, business-like, so as not to affect efficiency. .</ P> <P> need to observe to avoid crowding. .Into a new environment, we must first identify who the opinion leaders. .Even without the ability to observe, you can also ask around colleagues. .Interpersonal problem is difficult to explain rationally, event or being pushed out, they do not feel rough to revenge, and there is a saying: Do not feud with the villain hatred, the villain's own head. .According to experience, such a person will usually excluded by other opinion leaders. .If you determine that your not wrong to continue to do so, time will tell, will not be long, exclusion goes away. .</ P>.