Boss and employee ownership "generation gap"

In the job market, mobility is very good, in an open society, everyone has their own choice, the ancients said: the first is not to water. Mean, ground water, can flow to the end some not is one of the first stream of water. Work is a person living in a natural way, put aside just embarked on a "novice" of society, I'm here to say that there is a certain experience and experience of recruits, tends to be stable period, the time of resignation or retirement.

This show, I think it should be a collision between two points. Different viewpoints together formed a "generation gap". Work for a period of time, or just starting a few days, employees choose to leave or resign this illustrates what? I believe that this is the boss and the generation gap of belonging among employees.

As a boss, will certainly be clean, not employees, just to do a few days to not static, boss also added the exclamation: today's youth! can't. I and a lot of the boss the chatting is such a feeling, why? boss everyone thinks he is providing the platform, I give you, I, staff, on my platform to work, you also do not work as I intended to do?

In fact, there are two reasons: first, a lot of the boss has such a State of mind, as he provides a platform for employees, but he didn't realize he is staff to bring wealth, each employee is the source of his wealth. No employee, his platform not operation, staff will get in return, they were the employees own earned, just a few of the company's wealth. They are, a lot of the boss is not willing to put his wealth and share new recruits to the employees, how do I know that his ability is strong or not, whether or not we can bring profit for me, so I have to wait a certain period of time, in the period between the high on their Grand, big on the prospects for the company, but still in the trial period to gain a little more employees (just normal wages), allowing employees to create a genuine wealth, I paid to him. Often many people see the boss was such a State of mind, feel themselves be suspected, the reuse, insecure, so he resigned. Or boss, a capacity above the staff attitude, not employees, employees of a mistake, is liable to pay, in a few for times of economic penalties also fancy wrappings called is the company's system. Having said that, since employees are the boss, the entry is approved by the appropriate posts, so that the boss to believe their own eyes and pay the costs, there is a price, it should not be allowed to newly recruited staff to assume. Furthermore, new employees only in the sense of being reused will work harder, the complete benefits as soon as possible. Wrong, everyone, boss if everything is higher than the capacity of employees, employees on how to be reflected? boss, should not be a teacher, his strengths is in there is the ability of employees to organize, coordinate, support company operations.

As a staff party, select Exit or quit a lot is helpless, in the capital in the games, the staff is the proletariat, Maslow's five demands a sense of belonging in the staff actually have been looking for, but the sense of belonging is not very easy to find, on the one hand their own interests, on the other hand also in companies (boss), safeguarding the interests of the company. Is there any water on the great river, the River is full, pot, Bowl is, in fact, the employee is aware of,

Employees who believe that my abilities as embodied and boss, why the boss also does not believe me? trial or try Kong, pay half or 80%, on the one hand to cattle than work, on the one hand, and not to the cows eat grass. This is the boss of defects, their duty in the new platform on doing things that will comply with company rules, pre-service, both sides can be said clearly, but not distrust in their employment, or to request that just one entry requires a completed and how many number of sales, or to request a certain goal reached, time and space are important, but it needs to process.

Boss and employee ownership gap between, the generation gap in fact has a balanced factors, after all, the boss has his starting point, the employee has his understanding, I think, have a responsibility, as a staff party, young and impetuous, in view of the overall situation is not as good as the boss, his social tolerance is limited, or resign.